Convicted, fined a woman who smashed a car she drove without a license

A man filed a lawsuit against a woman before the Court of First Instance in Abu Dhabi, in which he demanded a ruling to oblige her to pay him an amount of 5,000 dirhams in the fees for dismantling his vehicle and compensation for the damages he sustained in the amount of 13,000 dirhams, in addition to obligating her to pay fees and expenses.

A man filed a lawsuit against a woman before the Court of First Instance in Abu Dhabi, in which he demanded a ruling to oblige her to pay him an amount of 5,000 dirhams in the fees for dismantling his vehicle and compensation for the damages he sustained in the amount of 13,000 dirhams, in addition to obligating her to pay fees and expenses.

Explaining his lawsuit, he said that the defendant did not have a driver’s license and that she took his vehicle without his knowledge and consent, and committed a traffic accident that resulted in damage to the vehicle, and the vehicle was seized, and the defendant was convicted of that incident under a penal ruling, and a copy of the accident report was submitted in support of his claim, and a copy of the penal verdict.

While the report of the engineering expert delegated by the court showed that the chassis of the car was damaged from the front side, the front end of the vehicle was completely destroyed, and the car in question had suffered significant damage, as was proven in the inspection report, which makes it by virtue of total destruction, and there is no point in repairing it.

The experience estimated the market value of the vehicle before the date of the accident at 12,000 dirhams, and the experience estimated the value of the vehicle’s wreck at 1,500 dirhams, and the daily benefit amounted to 100 dirhams. The Court of First Instance ordered the defendant to pay the complainant an amount of 16,500 dirhams.

This judiciary was not accepted by the defendant, so she appealed against him and appealed against the appealed judgment of lack of causation and corruption in inference for its reliance on an expert report that has nothing to do with the truth about his exaggeration in estimating the value of the car and its reliance on the complainant’s statements and not announcing them in the attendance session for the experience, in addition to the fact that the car was received with the approval of From the complainant, despite knowing that she does not have a driver’s license.

For its part, the Al Ain Court of Appeal clarified in the merits of its ruling that the defendant had appealed the appealed judgment as an exception from the established principle, which is that the appeal is not permissible due to the lack of a quorum, as the value of the case does not exceed fifty thousand dirhams.

Accordingly, the court ruled not to accept the appeal and to charge the defendant with fees and expenses.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here