She seizes her brother’s car and commits violations

Abu Dhabi: A man filed a lawsuit before the Abu Dhabi Family Court and Civil and Administrative Claims against his sister, in which he demanded to oblige her to hand over the vehicle at the earliest date and the nearest police station and to oblige her to pay the value of the violations and fines registered on the car in the amount of 30,000 dirhams, in addition to the legal interest of 12%, fees and expenses.

Abu Dhabi: A man filed a lawsuit before the Abu Dhabi Family Court and Civil and Administrative Claims against his sister, in which he demanded to oblige her to hand over the vehicle at the earliest date and the nearest police station and to oblige her to pay the value of the violations and fines registered on the car in the amount of 30,000 dirhams, in addition to the legal interest of 12%, fees and expenses.

Explaining his claim, he said that his sister (the defendant) had seized his vehicle and had committed violations on it, in addition to her refusal and rejection of his repeated demand that the vehicle should be returned and handed over to him.

The complainant added that the value of the vehicle is estimated at 40 thousand dirhams, that the defendant is his sister, and that he gave her the car in question to use and fulfil her needs, but she committed many violations in the vehicle and did not return it to him, pointing out that there are no criminal cases between him and the defendant, and provided a copy of Detect violations.

Whereas the defendant did not attend, and her announcement by a text message of the lawsuit was shown on the phone number that the present complainant decided that it belonged to her.

For its part, the wisdom explained in the rationale for its ruling is that the first article of the Evidence Law stipulates that the plaintiff must prove his right and the defendant may deny it, noting that the case papers are devoid of any evidence of the validity of what the complainant claims and did not request an investigation to prove the validity of what he claims.

Accordingly, the court decided to dismiss the case in its case and obligated the complainant to pay the expenses and fees.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here